← Professional resources

Professional reference

Operational behavior definitions

Use these definitions to make reports, observations, and team conversations more specific. They describe behavior; they do not establish motive, diagnosis, abuse, or a custody recommendation.

Badmouthing the other parent

Operational definition

Negative, demeaning, or hostile statements about the other parent made to or within earshot of the child.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Limiting contact

Operational definition

Actions that reduce scheduled, ordinary, or spontaneous contact between the child and the other parent.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Interfering with communication

Operational definition

Blocking, monitoring, redirecting, or disrupting calls, texts, messages, or other direct communication.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Interfering with symbolic communication

Operational definition

Blocking photos, gifts, cards, mentions, or other ordinary reminders of the other parent.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Withdrawal of love or conditional approval

Operational definition

Withholding affection, approval, or belonging when the child shows warmth toward the other parent.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Telling the child the parent does not love them

Operational definition

Statements or repeated suggestions that the other parent does not love, want, or care about the child.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Forcing the child to choose

Operational definition

Direct or indirect pressure requiring the child to demonstrate loyalty to one parent over the other.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Telling the child the parent is dangerous

Operational definition

Presenting the other parent as unsafe, threatening, or harmful without a substantiated, child-relevant basis.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Confiding in the child about adult or court matters

Operational definition

Sharing litigation, financial, relationship, or other adult information that places the child in an adult role.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Forcing the child to reject the other parent

Operational definition

Directing, scripting, rewarding, or otherwise pressuring the child to refuse or denounce the other parent.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Asking the child to spy

Operational definition

Requesting information about the other parent, household, or activities for use in adult conflict or litigation.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Asking the child to keep secrets

Operational definition

Instructing the child to conceal information from the other parent or carry adult secrets.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Referring to the parent by first name

Operational definition

Consistently replacing a parent title with a first name in a way that diminishes the parent role.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Referring to a step-parent as “Mom” or “Dad”

Operational definition

Encouraging a child to use a parental title for a step-parent while displacing or erasing the other parent.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Withholding medical, academic, or other information

Operational definition

Failing to share or actively blocking access to information needed for the other parent to participate in care.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Rowen & Emery (2014)

Changing the child’s name to remove association

Operational definition

Changing, shortening, or modifying the child’s name to reduce connection with the other parent.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Baker & Chambers (2011)

Cultivating dependency or undermining autonomy

Operational definition

Encouraging excessive dependence or portraying the child’s independent relationship with the other parent as disloyal.

Measure

Frequency — how many times this behavior occurred during a stated period. · Duration — how long one episode lasted; record start and end times when known. · Context or antecedent — what happened immediately before, where it happened, and who was present. · Latency — how long it took for the behavior to begin after a clear request, opportunity, or event. · Intensity or response magnitude — the observable size of the response, such as exact words, volume, distance, or disruption; avoid a severity score without a defined scale.

Examples

  • A dated record describing the specific words or actions, who was present, and what happened next.
  • A repeated pattern supported by contemporaneous messages, calendars, or independent witnesses.

Non-examples

  • A conclusion about a person's motive without a description of observable behavior.
  • A single difficult interaction that has no broader context or corroborating record.

Sources: Baker & Darnall (2006); Harman et al. (2016); Williams et al. (2012)

Edited by Rob Spain, BCBA, IBA·Scope review by Reunify Science··Educational scope·Safety resources

Professional resources are educational and do not replace jurisdiction-specific legal, clinical, or safety review.